Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +1088%
22.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
May 2023
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
34
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
4352
80
TMUs
136
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
AD106
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD106-350-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy