Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2004
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
NV43
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy