Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +208%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy