Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390 X2 +175%
5.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Sep 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
40
1280
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Grenada
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
580W
450 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy