Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
490 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
31.36GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
49W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
R420
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
R420 GTO
TeraScale 3
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy