CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
VS
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 151W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
+650%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G92
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
151W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
5
AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
8
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon HD 6390
9
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD FirePro S7000
10
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy