CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
VS
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+655%
9.062 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
40
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU104
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Board Design
151W
TDP
215W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
5
AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
8
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
9
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA NVS 315
10
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs ATI FireGL V8650
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy