CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
VS
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 TiM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
+1283%
16.6 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
46
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
135.4 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.60 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.60 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
259.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA104
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
151W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
5
AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
8
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 370
9
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
10
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs AMD Radeon HD 6970
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy