Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V9800

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +126%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1600
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cypress
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy