Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +52%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GM206
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy