Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +670%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 23
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy