Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

ATI FirePro V8750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750 +172%
1.2 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
4
800
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
R600
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy