Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 +101%
2.413 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1127 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GM206
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy