Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +377%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
44
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Vesuvius
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy