Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +51%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
274W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy