Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +342%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy