CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
ATI FirePro V8800
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
+342%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
VS
GeForce GTX 295
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT200B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
208W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs ATI FirePro V8800
3
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI FirePro V8800
5
NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs ATI FirePro V8800
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs ATI FirePro V8800
7
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
8
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
9
ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400
10
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy