Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +90%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GM107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GM107-400-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy