Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 260

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (95W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +71%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
12
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.536 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Bonaire
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
95W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy