Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +225%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Fiji
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy