CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
VS
ATI FirePro V8800
AMD Radeon R9 290X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X
+113%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
VS
Radeon R9 290X
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
44
1600
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Board Design
208W
TDP
290W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs ATI FirePro V8800
3
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5550
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs ATI FirePro V8800
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI FirePro V8800
6
NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs ATI FirePro V8800
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8800
8
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5630
9
ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
10
ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy