Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +113%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
290W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy