Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs Intel Arc A750

ATI FirePro V9800 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +532%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-512
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy