Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1480 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +1788%
2.72 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV630
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy