CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
VS
ATI FirePro V9800
AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
+112%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8760 OEM
1.28 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
VS
Radeon HD 8760 OEM
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2013
FirePro
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
10
1600
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Latte XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
2
ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM
3
ATI FirePro V9800 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
4
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
5
ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
6
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon 550
7
ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
8
ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GA104
9
ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
10
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy