CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
VS
ATI FirePro V9800
AMD Radeon RX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
+4%
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560
2.611 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
VS
Radeon RX 560
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
16
1600
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB vs ATI FirePro V9800
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V9800
3
AMD FirePro W7000 vs ATI FirePro V9800
4
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI FirePro V9800
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI FirePro V9800
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs ATI FirePro V9800
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V9800
8
ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650
9
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
10
ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 580G
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy