Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD FirePro W2100 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 26W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy