Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (950MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +682%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy