Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100 +866%
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
33W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy