Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +37%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy