Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100 +383%
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
32
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy