Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 162% (1785MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +1055%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
320
Shading Units
1408
20
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy