Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1000MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +841%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy