Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 171% (1845MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +1094%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
22
320
Shading Units
1408
20
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

26W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy