Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +281%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
10
320
Shading Units
640
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

26W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy