Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD FirePro W4000 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +279%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy