Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +779%
1.267 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV630
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy