Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +3859%
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy