Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +124%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU106
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy