Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +392%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT215
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy