Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +714%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA100
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy