Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +352%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy