Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

AMD FirePro W4000 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
VSA-101
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy