Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs Intel Arc A380

AMD FirePro W4100 vs Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Arc A380 +550%
4.198 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy