Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV516
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy