Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +83%
0.645 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV730
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy