AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
+682%
5.046 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W4100
475
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
+428%
2510
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2014
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
705 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK110B
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK110-350-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
