Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +93%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Lexa
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy