Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +24%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
6
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Oland
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy