Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +3472%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy