Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1532MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150 +70%
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
May 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy