Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD FirePro M4000

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Chelsea
-
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy